- 1Calculate your fully-loaded delivery cost. Not just hourly rate. Include benefits, overhead, software, time-off coverage.
- 2Set a target gross margin for the engagement type. Services typically target 40-60% gross margin.
- 3Translate margin target into a price floor. Below this, you lose money even with full utilization.
- 4Research what comparable providers charge. Set a price ceiling based on market.
- 5Position within the floor-to-ceiling band based on differentiation. What makes your offering specifically valuable?
- 6Stress-test against utilization assumptions. What happens at 60%, 70%, 80% billable capacity?
- 7Decide pricing model. Hourly, project, retainer, or value-based. Each fits different engagement types.
- 8Build in price increases ahead of cost increases. Annual review with documented rationale to existing clients.
Cost-plus is not a pricing strategy
Many service businesses set prices by calculating their cost and adding a margin. The problem with this approach is that it anchors pricing to your internal costs rather than to the value you deliver. Cost-plus pricing means you'll always undercharge clients who value your work highly and potentially overcharge those for whom the ROI is lower. It also limits your ability to improve margins through efficiency.
Cost-plus pricing (calculate your costs, add a margin) feels rigorous but misses the point of pricing. Two service businesses delivering the same work can have very different costs, one might be more efficient, one might be more junior. Cost-plus pricing ties your revenue to your operating inefficiencies. The more expensive your delivery, the more you charge, regardless of value.
More problematically, cost-plus caps your upside. If your cost structure for a particular client engagement is $20K and you apply a 50% markup, you charge $30K. But if the client values the outcome at $150K, you have left $120K on the table. Cost-plus is a floor, not a strategy.
Value-based pricing
Value-based pricing starts with the question: what is the economic value of the outcome we deliver? If your accounting and CFO work helps a $3M company raise a Series A that adds $10M to their valuation, the value of that work is meaningfully more than $3,000 per month. Pricing that reflects value rather than cost creates room for stronger margins and attracts clients who are serious about the outcomes you deliver.
Value-based pricing ties your price to the value the client receives. If your work produces $500K of savings or revenue for the client, pricing at $50-100K is reasonable, it captures 10-20% of the value you create. This requires understanding client outcomes well enough to quantify them, which is harder than tracking costs but produces fundamentally better pricing.
The framework: quantify the client problem in dollars, estimate the improvement your work produces, calculate the dollar value of that improvement, price at 10-30% of that value depending on the competitive dynamics and your conviction in outcomes. Services that produce hard-to-measure value (brand, culture, nuanced strategy) are harder to price this way but the approach still applies.
The financial model of your pricing
Every pricing decision should be modelled: what revenue does this client generate, what does it cost to deliver, and what is the gross margin? If you have clients at different price points, analyse whether the margin profile differs and why. Over time, you should be migrating your client mix toward higher-margin engagements and understanding the cost structure that makes that possible.
Pricing affects margin more than any other single variable. A service business with $2M revenue at 25% margin produces $500K of profit. The same business at 35% margin produces $700K. The difference comes almost entirely from pricing, because service business costs are relatively fixed. Raising average price 20% can move net profit up 50% or more.
The financial model of pricing also shapes who you can hire. Higher prices let you pay higher salaries, attract better talent, and invest in better tools. Firms that compete on price often get locked in a cycle where they cannot afford to invest in the things that would justify higher prices. Breaking that cycle usually requires a deliberate price reset.
When to raise prices
The clearest signal that you're underpriced is a full pipeline with no capacity. If you're turning away work, your price is too low, you should be pricing to the point where some prospects don't convert, which means you're optimising for margin rather than volume. Existing clients can be raised annually with appropriate notice; the clients who stay are self-selecting for the value they see in the relationship.
The best time to raise prices is before you need to. Most service firms wait until margins are squeezed, then rush through a price increase that feels reactive. Better to raise prices modestly every 12-18 months based on market positioning, not on urgent internal need. Clients are more receptive to a 5-10% annual increase than a 30% increase every three years.
New clients should always be priced at current rates. Honoring old pricing for old clients is fine for a transition period, but any firm that has different pricing for different clients based on when they signed is accumulating complexity that will eventually need to be cleaned up. Document the pricing history, grandfather existing clients briefly, and move everyone to current pricing over 6-12 months.
Finsightic handles accounting, controller oversight, and fractional CFO work for growing companies. Fixed monthly pricing, no long-term contracts.
Take the free Financial Health Score →